Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Repossession compliance: Mobile platforms put the goal line in sight

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Repossession compliance: Mobile platforms put the goal line in sight

    Anyone that has been involved with the repossession industry over the past several years knows that the world looks very different today than pre CFPB. Most of the focus during this period has been on 3rd and 4th party oversight. Given the CFPBs official position on vendor management, it is no longer acceptable to rely solely on the agent or repossession management company to keep their shops in order.



    Today, extensive vetting, on site visits to every storage lot, proper contracting, performance/compliance score cards and broader insurance coverage are the norm. As a result, lenders and regulators can be comfortable that the agents recovering cars on their behalf have been well vetted and are closely monitored. Indeed, the CFPB has expressed general satisfaction on this aspect of vendor management.



    At this point, there are two primary areas the CFPB is focused on when it comes to repossession: (1) Fees that consumers are charged for retrieving personal property, and to a lesser extent redeeming their vehicle and (2) repossessions made in error. Adequately addressing these issues will pretty much squeeze out the remaining regulatory concern and legal exposure.



    The fees issue has largely been addressed, especially by major lenders. Most have either mandated that any consumer charges be billed back to the lender (and posted to the customers account) or the allowable charges have been capped at defined and reasonable levels. There is still the issue of ensuring that agents follow the requirements, but we will save that for another post.



    This leaves the issue of Repossessions in Error as the final major area to be addressed. Indeed, the CFPB has referenced the matter in its last two bulletins.

    The vast majority of Repossession in Errors occur due to communication breakdowns. We see two types:

    1. Internal communication breakdown within the lenders operation where the auto repossession management company or agent was not notified when a repossession order was put on hold or closed. As a repossession management vendor for lenders, there is not much we can do to impact their internal processes/operations.
    2. Vendor(s) communication breakdowns when a hold/close has been issued properly by the lender but the proper communication and systems updating by all involved parties did not take place.



    The latter is largely a technology issue. The lenders, management companies (forwarders) and agents generally operate on different platforms and degrees of sophistication. And for each of these players, there are multiple platform options. Breakdowns can occur at each point along the way and these breakdowns account for a large percentage of Repossession in Errors. The diagram below illustrates the challenge and the components/integrations that must be in place to solve the problem:
    If your institution relies on repossession management companies to coordinate the repossession activity, integrations with these platforms must be in place.
    Nationwide Repossession Management Services
Working...
X